The Scoop

In the News

March 5, 2010

Democrats Weigh in On Reconciliation

President Obama and congressional leadership are nearing the end of the road on health care reform. The only option left to pass their grandiose visions of a government overhaul of the nation’s health care system into law is to pass the Senate-passed bill in the House. However, House Democrats will only go along with this if the bill is followed by a side-by-side bill including changes to the Senate bill, which could only clear the Senate using reconciliation, a method which would be both unpopular and unprecedented.

This does not come without its own laundry list of problems, as Democrats acknowledged this morning on National Public Radio’s Morning Edition. According to Bill Hoagland, a lobbyist for CIGNA and former Republican Staff Director for the Senate Budget Committee, “reconciliation cannot amend something that’s not law…so, if you’re trying to make changes to the health care reform bill to get it more appealing to the House members, they first have to hold their nose and cross their fingers and vote to pass the Senate-passed health care reform bill and send it to the President.”

This comes with certain sticking points for Democrats. The Senate bill would have to be passed first, without any assurance that the changes required by the House would later pass or even make it to a reconciliation vote. As Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) admits, “I’d say at this point, for any House member to vote for something that they object to, with the future potential possible prospect that the Senate will fix it later, when later often never comes in Washington, DC, is an unbelievable leap of faith.”

And passage in the Senate is anything but certain, as several Senate Democrats are leery of the process. Said Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND), “Look, I’m obviously not going to say I will support a package and I’ve never seen the package.”

Finally, former Senate Parliamentarian Robert Dove says “That vote counts as a real vote and is used against senators who can claim all they were doing was protecting the budget process, but suddenly are on record as refusing to weigh the budget act to deal with Guantanamo or trying people in New York—I can imagine the list of amendments will be sent forward.”

Reconciliation will not prove an easy path to the finish line for Democrats’ health care bills. President Obama and the congressional majority leaders still face several hurdles to passing their unpopular version of health care reform. Clearly, one of them will be assuaging the concerns of fellow Democrats.

Tags: , ,

  • Bookmark and Share
Comments Author: Kathryn Nix
  • iairesearch
    We the People Still Have the Power

    Americans can be pandered to with debates on C-SPAN or by watchdogs in the press. Political strategists can assure us the next election will secure our future. Meanwhile, the political class has learned to manipulate the average voter and bureaucrats have deeply imbedded control over our government.

    Yet our founders envisioned even this occurrence and created a mechanism for the people and the States to reassert control over an overpowering federal government.

    Article V of the Constitution states: “Congress … on the application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, …” But what should our State legislatures seek to amend?

    The only way to stop the wasteful spending, and its eventual debilitating taxation, is to starve the government machine. To do this, we need a Constitutional Amendment to insure that:

    1. Except in time of declared war against a foreign enemy, the federal government shall balance its budget. This budget shall include all cash expenditures and cash revenues for the federal government and all of its dependent agencies. Further, the total cash expenditures of the federal government shall not exceed eighteen percent (18%) of the prior year’s gross domestic product.

    2. Included in the budget’s cash expenditures will be an annual payment to retire the national debt. This payment will be not less than 3% of the principal amount of the prior year’s national debt.

    3. Any increase in taxes, fees, or other sources of revenue shall require a 2/3 vote of each chamber of Congress. All tax rates and fees as of January 1, 2010 will be re-established and be considered the baseline for any future changes.

    4. No unfunded mandates or requirements shall be placed on state or local governments. The costs of all federal laws must be paid by the federal government and be included in the annual balanced budget.

    Should the people decide they wish to spend more on certain items, they can petition their State or Local governments. Clearly, we cannot trust politicians. Unless specifically controlled, they will continue to use our money to buy votes for their own re-election. Encourage your state legislature to reassert its authority: call for a constitutional convention and pass these controls.

    Please share with others.

    www.IAIresearch.wordpress.com
blog comments powered by Disqus