The Scoop

In the News

August 6, 2009

Don’t Let Co-ops Become a Trojan Horse

According to today’s Washington Post, the Senate Finance Committee will soon produce a health care plan that rejects “a government-run health insurance plan in favor of a network of member-owned cooperatives.” More commonly referred to as “co-ops”, these organizations actually already have a long and proud tradition in many sectors of the U.S. economy, including health care. But Americans must be wary that our nation’s co-op tradition does not become a vehicle for government-run health care.

To some, the word “co-operative” may have a slight Bolshevik whiff to it, but actually a private co-op is nothing more than private individuals exercising their right to voluntarily self-associate. From farm bureaus to barn-raisers, private co-ops are part of American society. In the realm of health care, a group that organizes coverage provided by private insurers could be structured as a co-op. Or the health insurer itself could be a co-operative owned by its member policyholders. Those kind of insurance companies are called mutual insurers.

Understood in this manner, co-ops have far more to do with Edmund Burke and little platoons than with Leon Trotsky and manning the barricades. And they can be part of the health care solution.

But, don’t be fooled; Burkean little platoons are not what the Obama Administration and its allies in Congress have in mind. In liberal Washington today, leaders such as Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), are talking up co-ops that would be:

• Run by the government, preferably the federal government
• Funded or subsidized by the government, or
• Includes plans chosen by the government.

    A co-op with any of these three features is obviously unacceptable. A real co-op is:

    • Run by its members,
    • Funded by its members and other private sources, and
    • Controlled by its members.

      Why is the left fastening to co-ops now? Because their public plan idea—a way for the government to take over health care—has run into a buzz saw of opposition among the American people. Liberals have concluded, it seems, that there’s more than one way to skin a cat. So if the public plan was a Trojan horse for single-payer (which means a complete government takeover of your health care decisions), a co-op (the way liberals mean it) is a Trojan horse for a public plan.

      Congress should, of course, be empowering true local, private co-ops to be a real health choice for Americans. To do that, Congress needs to amend the tax laws to do two things: Allow mutual insurance companies to be the foundation of non-profit insurance companies; and give people the same tax breaks for getting insurance from a co-op as from their employer.

      None of this is, however, what some leading members of Congress have in mind when the subject of co-ops comes up.

      Tags: ,

      • Bookmark and Share
      Comments Author: Conn Carroll
      • bertam
        How sad it is that the same group of people that took over the news in the 1960's and 1970's now are in the very seats of power that they protested against back then. They are my generation and I have no more respect or use for them now than I did back then. It is true that something needs to be done about the COST of healthcare, little needs to be done about the actual care we receive. Every person living in the USA can be treated for illness, accident. Not everyone has insurance, but everyone can be treated. When I was a child, we visited the doctor only if we were really ill, not for any little annoyance or pain. The doctor was paid at the time of service and all was taken care of. My parents did have major medical insurance, in the event of a hospitalization, and that paid all of the occurrence. The doctor's overhead was kept low as he didn't need a staff of billers to wade through the stacks of insurance forms and then have the payment delayed or denied. The beginning of the end was when healthcare was offered in lieu of salary by employers and then another nail was added to the coffin with the HMO system. That created a monster of overuse and hypochonria. I know it seems too simplistic, but we do need to reform how insurance is issued, used and understood. One of the best options that has come about is the HSA as this leaves the money and decision making in the hands of the people. The thing that needs to be changed with HSA and all other insurances is the pre-existing condition clause. Also, insurance does need to be able to cross state lines - that would provide the sacred "competition" that the government wishes to provide with a public or co-op option. The other issue is tort reform - with the Congress being run by an overwhelming majority of attornies, this will probably never happen. I wonder how many people actually know how much these litigations cost the doctors and our healthcare system. For instance, how many know that an Obstetrician is liable for a delivery for 18 years! So the insurance rate is ridiculous!!
        The greatest reform needed in the US today, is that of Congress - even though there are some who truly care about their constituents, most care only for their own power and greed. It is time to "throw the bums out" , clean house and reinstate our Constitution!
      blog comments powered by Disqus