<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Bell: No Matter What You Call It, It&#8217;s Still Just Government-Run Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-no-matter-what-you-call-it-its-still-just-government-run-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-no-matter-what-you-call-it-its-still-just-government-run-health-care/</link>
	<description>A project of the Heritage Foundation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jacklohman</title>
		<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-no-matter-what-you-call-it-its-still-just-government-run-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>jacklohman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/?p=2044#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>So when the reality that &quot;private is NOT more efficient than public,&quot; we start calling it that dastardly &quot;government-run health care.&quot; Anything to stop progress.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The best system is single-payer. For the same amount of dollars we are spending today (16.5% of GDP) we could provide first-class Cheney-care to 100% of our population. Including those in Medicaid and are uninsured and under-insured.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;It’d be a Medicare-for-all system that would eliminate the insurance bureaucracy waste (31% of our costs) and we’d spend it on patient care instead. We’d pay for the system through our national infrastructure (taxes) and eliminate this cost for businesses. They could spend the savings on keeping jobs in the US instead of outsourcing to countries already with universal healthcare. A bailout for 100% of our businesses, not just the banks and car manufacturers.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;But instead, we are spending more time and money trying to avoid doing it the right way, than it would cost to do it correctly up front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when the reality that &#8220;private is NOT more efficient than public,&#8221; we start calling it that dastardly &#8220;government-run health care.&#8221; Anything to stop progress.   </p>
<p>The best system is single-payer. For the same amount of dollars we are spending today (16.5% of GDP) we could provide first-class Cheney-care to 100% of our population. Including those in Medicaid and are uninsured and under-insured.<br />.<br />It’d be a Medicare-for-all system that would eliminate the insurance bureaucracy waste (31% of our costs) and we’d spend it on patient care instead. We’d pay for the system through our national infrastructure (taxes) and eliminate this cost for businesses. They could spend the savings on keeping jobs in the US instead of outsourcing to countries already with universal healthcare. A bailout for 100% of our businesses, not just the banks and car manufacturers.<br />.<br />But instead, we are spending more time and money trying to avoid doing it the right way, than it would cost to do it correctly up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
