<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fix Health Care Policy &#187; Cap and Trade Global Warming Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/tag/cap-and-trade-global-warming-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com</link>
	<description>A project of the Heritage Foundation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Cap and Trade Affects the Health Care Debate</title>
		<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/how-cap-and-trade-affects-the-health-care-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/how-cap-and-trade-affects-the-health-care-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kreutzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap and Trade Global Warming Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Waxman-Markey energy tax plan will have all sorts of unwanted side effects. As the healthcare debate ramps up, it’s worth noting problems misguided global warming legislation can generate for medical care.
Though it would be nearly impossible to trace all the impacts of higher energy costs on medical services, one broad measure is the impact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Waxman-Markey energy tax plan will have all sorts of unwanted side effects. As the healthcare debate ramps up, it’s worth noting problems misguided global warming legislation can generate for medical care.</p>
<p>Though it would be nearly impossible to trace all the impacts of higher energy costs on medical services, one broad measure is the impact on the costs of medical care. By driving up energy costs, Waxman-Markey will drive up the costs of running hospitals, manufacturing medical equipment, producing drugs, driving ambulances, and virtually every other component of our healthcare system.</p>
<p>The Center for Data Analysis analyzed the economic impact of the Waxman-Markey energy tax legislation using the sophisticated Global Insight macro model. This model allows detailed analysis of the impacts by industry.</p>
<p>So what happens to healthcare? On top of all the other factors that will lead to higher prices down the road, Waxman-Markey will add an additional 11.6 percent to healthcare costs by 2035 (the last year of the analysis). So, though Waxman-Markey aims its economic bombs at global warming, healthcare will suffer hundreds of billions of dollars in collateral damage each year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/how-cap-and-trade-affects-the-health-care-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Bell: Cutting Recovery Off at the Knees</title>
		<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-cutting-recovery-off-at-the-knees/</link>
		<comments>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-cutting-recovery-off-at-the-knees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conn Carroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap and Trade Global Warming Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trillion dollar deficits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama travels to Macomb Community College in Michigan today where he will unveil $12 billion in aid to the nation&#8217;s community colleges. According to Politico, the President&#8217;s message will be that &#8220;in a competitive global economy, the country’s economic viability depends upon the education and skills of its workers, who will increasingly need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama travels to Macomb Community College in Michigan today where he will unveil $12 billion in aid to the nation&#8217;s community colleges. According to <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24891.html">Politico</a>, the President&#8217;s message will be that &#8220;in a competitive global economy, the country’s economic viability depends upon the education and skills of its workers, who will increasingly need to have college experience.&#8221; True enough, but who exactly does the President believe will be hiring all of these workers?</p>
<p>The unemployment rate in Michigan is more than 14% and the state is projected to lose more than 310,000 jobs in 2009. A recent study by the <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/Section.aspx?id=Entrepreneurship">Kaufman Foundation</a> found that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124753106668435899.html">small businesses have led America out of its last seven recessions, generating about two of every three new jobs during a recovery.</a> Unfortunately, the President&#8217;s top domestic priorities are set to cut off small business growth at the knees.</p>
<p><strong>Health Care:</strong> Our nation desperately needs health care reform that lets Americans begin reducing exploding health care costs. <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/18/open-letter-on-health-care/">The best way to do this is to reform the tax code to move away from employer-sponsored health care and remove regulations that are preventing a true health insurance market from functioning.</a> But the President does not want this change. He wants to build off <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDllYWQ3YTZhN2IxZmY3NzI4ODFhOGU1Y2NkMTAzMDg=">the failed models of Medicare and Medicaid</a> that got us into this mess in the first place. Worse, President Obama is set to fund his massive expansion of government-run health care on the backs of small businesses. The Senate wants to pay for their health care plan with <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/06/morning-bell-president-obamas-job-killing-health-care-tax/">an employer mandate that will cost small businesses hundreds of billions of dollars a year</a> and the House wants to pay for their health plan with a &#8220;surtax&#8221; on individuals with gross incomes above $280,000. Problem is, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124753106668435899.html">six of every ten who earn that much are small business owners, operators, and investors.</a><span id="more-813"></span></p>
<p><strong>Cap-and-Trade:</strong> President Obama continues to try and sell his cap-and-trade plan as a job creation bill, but Michiganders know better. During a committee hearing on cap-and-trade this year, Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muX-uRKOGLY">explained</a>: &#8220;Nobody in this country realizes that cap-and-trade is a tax &#8212; and it&#8217;s a great big one.&#8221; According to a Center for Data Analysis <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2438.cfm">study</a>, the economic costs of cap-and-trade by 2030 are: 1) reduced aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) of $7.4 trillion; 2) 844,000 jobs destroyed on average every year; and 3) a $1,500 raise in an average family’s annual energy costs.</p>
<p><strong>Trillion Dollar Deficits:</strong> The U.S. Treasury announced yesterday that the government&#8217;s annual deficit reached almost $1.1 trillion by the end of June. Despite his promises to the contrary, President Obama&#8217;s spending plans will only make this problem worse. <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/tst071309a.cfm">His budget would increase federal spending to a peacetime-record 24.5 percent of GDP by 2019 &#8212; not even counting the health care plan.</a> Because tax revenues cannot keep up with this spending growth, the President&#8217;s budget would add $9.1 trillion in new debt over the next decade. It would double the national debt to 82 percent of GDP by 2019. Looking at these budget forecasts, <a href="../2009/06/11/deficit-spending-and-higher-interest-rates-imperil-the-recovery/">investors are demanding higher interest rates to soak up the tremendous flows of debt coming out of the Treasury.</a> <a href="../2009/05/08/terrible-treasury-auction-exposes-hole-in-obama-econ-plan/">This will mean higher interest rates for consumer loans, mortgage loans, business loans, etc.</a></p>
<p>At some point, the President is going to have to realize that businesses, not the federal government, are the ones who will be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100647.html">rebuilding</a> our economy.</p>
<p><strong>Quick Hits:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The White House will soon be f<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24899.html">orced to acknowledge that their economic forecasts for long-term growth are too optimistic</a> when a new budget forecast will be unveiled next month.</li>
<li>The U.S. retail industry&#8217;s largest trade group, the National Retail Federation, sent a letter to their 2,500 members asking them to take a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc07/idUSTRE56C4GP20090713">stand against Wal-Mart&#8217;s endorsement</a> of employer-mandated health insurance.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24876.html">current car czar, Steve Rattner, is stepping down</a> and will be replaced by union strongman Ron Bloom.</li>
<li>With six months left before a White House deadline, the Obama administration is unlikely to meet <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/us/politics/14gitmo.html?_r=1&amp;ref=todayspaper">President Obama’s pledge to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by January.</a></li>
<li>President Obama vowed yesterday to veto a pending $680 billion military spending bill for next year unless the Senate removed <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/13/AR2009071303098.html">$1.75 billion</a> set aside to buy seven additional F-22 fighter jets.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/morning-bell-cutting-recovery-off-at-the-knees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
