Posts Tagged ‘Medicare Part D’
In the News
January 6, 2010Reconciling Health Reform Taxes and Fees on Individuals and Businesses
One of the key issues the White House, House, and Senate will be negotiating behind closed doors, is how to pay for President Obama’s $2.5 trillion plan. Reconciling the differences between these two bills will remain a difficult task for legislators particularly as they rely on a different mix of revenue-generators. The following two lists include key revenue-generating mechanisms in both the House and Senate bills as reported by Tax Notes.
House-passed Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962):
– $460.5 billion over 10 years from a 5.4 percent Surtax on individuals making more than $500,000 and families earning more than $1 million (begins 2011)
– $135 billion as part of an 8 percent tax of a firm’s payroll ($750,000 or more) and a lower rate if firm payroll is between $500,000 $749,999 (begins 2013)
– $33 billion as part of a 2.5 tax on modified adjusted gross income (AGI) for those individuals that do fail to secure “acceptable” health coverage (begins 2014)
– $20 billion from a 2.5 percent excise tax on medical devices (begins 2013) (more…)
Tags: closed doors, excise tax, Flexible Spending Accounts, House surtax, Individual Mandate, Medicare Part D, Medicare Payroll tax increase
Latest Research
September 28, 2009Obamacare: Day Three of Senate Finance Committee Hearings
Obamacare: Day Three of Senate Finance Committee Hearings
On Thursday, September 24th, the Senate Finance Committee continued to vote on amendments to the “Chairman’s Mark” of the America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009. As the committee continues to consider more than 500 amendments, it is becoming clear that Senators are directly undercutting the high profile promises that President Obama made to the American people in his widely broadcasted address to Congress on September 9, 2009. Consider several health policy decisions made by members of the Senate Finance Committee:
Cutting Medicare Advantage (Crapo-Kyl-Roberts Amendment D1)
The White House and Congressional leaders routinely insist that they are not going to cut Medicare benefits, only unnecessary spending or spending properly considered to be waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicare program. Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), and Pat Roberts (R-KS) proposed an amendment to change the Chairman’s mark and remove provisions in Title III, Subtitle D which would result in cuts to Medical Advantage, a program which allows Medicare users to obtain coverage through private insurers. Cuts in payments to Medicare Advantage plans would result in decreased choice and competition for seniors. This amendment failed on a procedural vote (9-9). (more…)
Tags: Barack Obama, Baucus bill, big government, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D, Medicare trigger, middle class, obama deficit, Obama Health, Obama Health Care Plan, Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees
Latest Research
September 9, 2009The House Health Bill’s Higher Costs For Seniors
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a preliminary analysis of the proposed changes to Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit for seniors, under the Ways and Means version of H.R. 3200, the House Democrats’ health care bill. The bill would make a number of changes to the Medicare program and its drug benefit, including phasing out the infamous doughnut hole or gap in drug coverage that some seniors have run up against. In a recent letter, the CBO estimated:
“That enacting the proposed changes would lead to an average increase in premiums for Part D beneficiaries, above those under current law, of about 5 percent in 2011. That effect would rise over time and reach about 20 percent in 2019. Beyond the 10-year budget window, the premiums would increase slightly more until the doughnut hole was eliminated in 2022; beyond that point, enrollees’ premiums would grow along with the cost for covered drugs.”
CBO director Douglas Elmendorf goes on to write, “the proposed changes would also reduce beneficiaries’ average cost sharing and their average total drug spending.” But while, on average, seniors might save on their total drug costs, Elmodorf explains, “The net effect on drug spending would differ among beneficiaries depending on the amount of their purchases in a year.” (more…)
Tags: CBO, government-run health care, House Ways and Means, HR3200, Medicare Part D, Obama Health Care Plan





