<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fix Health Care Policy &#187; republican</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/tag/republican/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com</link>
	<description>A project of the Heritage Foundation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U.S. House Votes in Favor of Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/u-s-house-votes-in-favor-of-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/u-s-house-votes-in-favor-of-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Moffit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Health Care Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/?p=2224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The health care bill passed by the House tonight took another step towards transferring power over personal health care decisions from individuals to bureaucrats in Washington. The Republican alternative was a good strong first step of targeted reforms that are necessary to improve health care financing and delivery.
If it were to become law, the House [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float: right; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px"><img src="http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sat-health-care.gif" alt="" title="" width="300" height="313" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-19458" />
</p>
<p>The health care bill <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/07/AR2009110701504.html">passed by the House tonight</a> took another step towards transferring power over personal health care decisions from individuals to bureaucrats in Washington. The Republican alternative was a good strong first step of targeted reforms that are necessary to improve health care financing and delivery.</p>
<p>If it were to become law, the House bill would <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/04/the-government-takeover-of-health-care-in-pictures/">put the government in control of over half of all health care spending</a> and would dramatically shift America’s health care system from one that is largely private to one that is subordinated to government control.</p>
<p>The bill engineers a <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/30/the-house-health-bill-a-welfare-spending-explosion/">massive expansion of the Medicaid</a>, a welfare program that provides substandard care to lower-income and poor Americans and threatens state budgets. The addition of the public plan, a new federal health care entitlement, would <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/29/the-house-health-care-bill-a-700-billion-tax-hike/">add to the crushing tax burden</a> Americans already face from exiting entitlements. Even worse,<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/morning-bell-the-public-option-is-neither-public-nor-an-option/"> millions of Americans would be pushed out of their existing health care coverage</a>, notwithstanding the promises of the President.<span id="more-2224"></span></p>
<p>The bill would create massive bureaucracy. Under the bill, <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/30/pelosi-plan-would-give-health-czar-super-powers/">the new health care commissioner would in fact become a health care czar</a>. This bureaucrat would exercise unprecedented power over the kinds of benefits and medical services available to individuals and families.</p>
<p>The bill also creates new inequities. <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/02/states-lose-control-families-lose-choices-under-obamacares-medicaid-expansion/">While it would extent lavish subsidies to certain individuals, it would exclude those with employer-based coverage and would guarantee that others would be confined to substandard care in the Medicaid program.</a></p>
<p>Contrary to the promises of the President, the House bill would impose new taxes on all Americans regardless of class or income. <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/29/the-house-health-care-bill-the-mandates/">The employer mandate and the individual mandate would tax the middle class</a>. While the country is trying to recover from a deep and dangerous recession, it is ironic that the day after <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/06/morning-bell-10-unemployment-shows-objective-failure-of-obama-stimulus/">the jobless rate officially reached 10.2%</a> that Congress would insist on imposing more taxes on individuals and businesses.</p>
<p>The President has insisted that reform should bend the curve on health care spending. This legislation makes a mockery of that goal. The<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/06/yes-26-trillion-a-closer-look-at-the-full-10-years-of-spending-in-the-house-health-bill//"> true cost of the bill</a> is in excess of the President’s $900 billion spending target &#8212; the full costs will run in the trillions.</p>
<p>The good news is the battle is not over. There is consensus in the U.S. for serious reform of the health care system. But, there is no consensus for a federal government takeover of 1/6th of the US economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/u-s-house-votes-in-favor-of-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
