Posts Tagged ‘Senate Bill’
In the News
February 4, 2010The Public Option Threat Still Buried in the Senate Bill
Most Americans now believe that major health care legislation will not pass this year. But as Heritage Vice President Stuart Butler explains in The New England Journal Medicine one seemingly minor proposal in the Senate health care bill could end up having huge repercussions for our entire health care system:
“The Senate legislation contains strong directives to the OPM, requiring it to negotiate medical-loss ratios (the percentage of premiums that insurers actually spend on medical care for enrollees), minimum benefits, profit margins, premiums, and “such other terms and conditions of coverage as are in the interests of enrollees in such plans.” Crucially, the legislation also specifies that the OPM-administered plans would automatically be deemed to meet all the requirements for plans to be offered through the health exchanges created by the legislation.1 This means that OPM-administered plans could in practice operate free of many of the financial regulations that exchanges might impose on other plans, allowing the plans to operate under their own OPM-designed regulations.” (more…)
Tags: New England Journal of Medicine, OPM, public option, Senate Bill, Stuart Butler
In the News
January 29, 2010If You Like Bureaucracy And Red Tape, Then You’ll Love The Health Care Bill
Time and time again, congressional leaders have denied that the proposed health care legislation would result in a federal takeover of health care. Proponents of Obamacare claim that consumers would retain personal choice in selecting health plans and physicians. For example, consider President Obama’s comments at a Raleigh, NC town-hall meeting on July 29, 2009: “Nobody is talking about some government takeover of health care. I’m tired of hearing that…Under the plan I’ve proposed…if you like your health care plan, you keep your health care plan.”
The President and Congressional leaders fail to mention that, under the House and Senate bills, the federal government would determine the kind of health plans Americans get— the kinds of insurance Americans would get, the level of coverage they can receive, and the premiums, co-payments and taxes they would pay. It even mandates that all individuals purchase a government-defined level of health insurance coverage, regardless of their personal wants or needs. (more…)
Tags: bureaucracy, House Bill, ObamaCare, President Barack Obama, Senate Bill, townhall meeting
Latest Research
August 12, 2009More Interference in Health Insurance, Not Less
Yesterday, President Obama tried to quiet growing concern by Americans over health care reform. He said, “For all the chatter and the yelling and the shouting and the noise, what you need to know is this … if you do have health insurance, we will make sure that no insurance company or government bureaucrat gets between you and the care you need.”
This appears to be another promise that President Obama will have a hard time keeping under the bills moving through Congress. Ed Haislmaier, Senior Research Fellow in the Center for Health Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation, points out in a recent paper that “Both the pending House health care bill and Senate HELP Committee bill include provisions that would, if enacted, result in sweeping, complex, and highly discretionary new federal regulation of health insurance.”
That doesn’t sound like less government interference… that sounds like more. (more…)
Tags: health reform, House Bill, Senate Bill







